Canadian Poultry Magazine

Features Manure Management Production
PIC Update: Preserving the Past for the Future

Preserving the past for the future


April 4, 2008
By PIC

Topics

Transplantation and cryopreservation of chicken gonads

By Tim Nelson, Executive Director, and Kimberly Sheppard, Research Co-ordinator

Today’s commercial poultry are generally sourced from only one of two breeders. This means that commercial avian genetics are becoming narrower and genetic variation is being lost. It is important to preserve genetic material so that we retain the ability to be able to breed birds and adapt them for potential new production environments, disease resistance etc.

Advertisement
pic1
CONSERVING GERMPLASM
Drs. Fred Silversides (below) and Yonghong Song have successfully transplanted ovarian and testicular tissue between newly hatched chicks, and have frozen gonadal tissue, offering a new possible protocol for conserving avian germplasm. 
pic2

A common method of preserving genetic variation is to take genetic material (e.g., sperm) from living birds and freeze it for future use. However, avian genetic material is difficult to store by accepted methods.

As an alternative method of preserving avian genetic material, Drs. Yonghong Song and Fred Silversides at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, have been working on transplanting ovarian or testicular tissue to recipient chicks. Pilot work had suggested that transplantation of ovarian tissue in newly hatched chicks might be successful.

To test their theory, ovaries were removed from day-old White Leghorn chicks and replaced with ovarian tissue from Barred Plymouth Rocks (BPR). Some chicks were administered an immunosuppressant, and all birds were raised to sexual maturity. The hens that received the ovarian transplants were inseminated with semen from BPR roosters (if the transplant was successful, this would result in black chicks). Black chicks were indeed produced – the first report of success using this technique.

In males, the testes were removed and donor tissue was placed into the abdominal cavity or under the skin of the back or abdomen. Frozen/thawed tissue was also used for some of these transplants. All successful recipients of testicular tissue showed normal comb and wattle development. Once the birds were sexually mature, transplanted testes were removed from the hosts, cut into small pieces, and the fluid that seeped from the surface was collected. This fluid was used to inseminate BPR hens by surgically placing it in the oviduct. This prodecure produced fertile eggs resulting in black, donor-derived chicks.

A simple freezing protocol was also used to preserve testicular tissue from day-old BPR chicks. This was later transplanted into the abdominal cavities of nine castrated WL chicks. Insemination using sperm from one transplant produced 23 offspring.

What does all this mean? The researchers were able to successfully transplant ovarian and testicular tissue between newly hatched chicks, and freeze gonadal tissue using a simple protocol. These techniques provide simple approaches for the conservation of chicken germplasm and may provide a universal protocol for the conservation of avian germplasm of all species and lines.

To read more about this project visit: www.poultryindustrycouncil.ca and click on “Research Results.

pic3The Researchers

Dr. Fred Silversides was raised in Saskatchewan where he completed an undergraduate degree in poultry science and a PhD in poultry genetics. In between his Saskatchewan degrees, he obtained an M.Sc. in animal genetics from the University of Massachusetts. After a year-long post-doctoral position in France, he taught at Universit? Laval before leaving in 1996 for British Columbia and eventually starting work for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada in 2000. After three years in Nova Scotia, he relocated to the Agassiz Research Centre in British Columbia. Dr. Silversides was trained as a poultry geneticist but conducts research on poultry in a broad range of disciplines. His research activities include poultry nutrition and welfare, but his principal interests are in conservation of poultry genetic resources.

Dr. Yonghong Song received his bachelor’s degree in veterinary medicine and his M.Sc. degree in animal physiology and biochemistry, both from China. His PhD training was from the Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University under Dr. James Petitte, working on avian primordial germ cells. He came to Dr. Silversides’ lab as a visiting fellow in June 2004 to work on reproductive manipulation for genetic conservation. He is currently a research associate with Dr. Kim Cheng at University of British Columbia, and is continuing his research at Agassiz on ovarian and testicular tissue transplantation between different species of birds.

So you’re either reading this at or you just got back from the London Poultry Show. You’ve had a great time, seen some new equipment, listened to four terrific speakers and caught up with some old friends. You’ve just read two brilliant short articles on some important research that you’ve helped fund and you’re wondering what’s coming next from PIC?

pic4
The PIC has signed a memorandum of understanding with each of Ontario’s poultry boards to set funds for research priorities each year. (L to R) Bill Laidlaw, Chicken Farmers of Ontario (CFO) general manager, chair Bill Woods, and PIC’s Ed McKinlay and Tim Nelson.

BIG STEP FORWARD
With the advent of the strategy and the “outcome” focus of our work, the way in which projects are being supported by the feather boards is also changing. Each of the boards has signed a memorandum of understanding with PIC, locking in a set amount of funds each year “this MOU gives us the ability to be able to plan ahead for research investment and will give government and other co-investors the confidence that the industry is a serious partner in research” says PIC chairman Ed McKinley, “it also means that if industry is looking for some specific work to be done and we don’t receive a proposal for that particular work, we can commission the research. Its essentially given industry more flexibility and control” he said.

 
Risk Management for Manure Development of management tools
for reducing P availability in animal manures
Dr. Valtcho Jeliazkov, MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY
Collaborators: Dr. Claude Caldwell, Dr. Bruce Rathberger, Mrs. Jean Lynds (Dairy Farmers of Nova Scotia)

The phosphorous (P) from plant-based poultry diets is difficult for poultry to utilize, so poultry diets are supplemented with inorganic P. As a result, the manure produced by poultry can contain up to four times more P than other types of manure. This increases the potential for P to escape into the environment and eventually into water courses. This in turn leads to the growth of oxygen-depleting plant life, which causes harm to other organisms – a process known as eutrophication. High levels of phosphate linked to agricultural practices, is already causing environmental problems in some jurisdictions. The application of P-enriched manure therefore increases environmental risk.

Dr. Valtcho Jeliazkov of Mississipi State University has been investigating argonomically, economically and environmentally viable methods of reducing P availability in manures. Research has shown that solubility of P in manure can be reduced by incorporating aluminum-based compounds. His studies looked at five different concentrations of a wide variety of compounds mixed with three manures (liquid dairy, broiler, and layer) used to fertilize trial hay/pasture plots using the pasture species Timothy. Two control manures were also used – one with nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium (NPK) added, and one without. Natural conditions were simulated, and available P as well as effects on Timothy yield, were tested.

His findings? In field experiments, mineral pre-treatments reduced extractable P content of manure and soil without negative effects on plant growth. Aluminum sulphate and ferric chloride compounds produced promising results, with all other manure and compound combinations producing results no different from controls. Pre-treated manures did not reduce Timothy yield. The results from this project contribute to the development of a feasible management tool for reducing P availability in dairy and poultry manure. To read more about this project visit: www.poultryindustrycouncil.ca and click on “Research Results.”


Print this page

Related



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*